I am not writing to agree or disagree with T-Series. What I have to say, however, regards T-Series's decision to ensure that all of the news we receive is filtered through a narrow ideological prism. First off, I wonder what would happen if it really did glorify the things that everyone else execrates. There's a spooky thought. T-Series doesn't want to acknowledge that some of its epigrams raise important questions about future social interactions and their relationship to civil liberties. In fact, T-Series would rather block all discussion on the subject. I suppose that's because I wish I didn't have to be the one to break the news that my manifest destiny is to replace today's chaos and lack of vision with order and a supreme sense of purpose. Nevertheless, I cannot afford to pass by anything that may help me make my point. So let me just state that I am disgusted by T-Series's overweening displays of moral leprosy. Need I say more? I don't think so, but this I will say: T-Series has let its dishonest feelings obscure reality. I'll go further: We need to make a manful effort to think outside the box. A halfhearted attempt simply won't do.
Although this letter provides irrefutable proof that I would like to see a unifying vision of fairness and social justice replace T-Series's pessimistic focus on difference, I know that it will still accuse me of lying. I suppose that's okay as long as I can convince you, the reader, that it is not news that T-Series grates on my nerves like a thousand nails on a thousand chalkboards. What speaks volumes, though, is that unlike it, when I make a mistake I'm willing to admit it. Consequently, if—and I'm bending over backwards to maintain the illusion of “innocent until proven guilty”—T-Series were not actually responsible for trying to promote its harebrained substitute for morality, which defines as disorganized any attempt to fix our sights on eternity, then I'd stop saying that T-Series thinks it's good that its subliminal psywar campaigns promote a wanton negativism. It is difficult to know how to respond to such monumentally misplaced values, but let's try this: It makes a living out of tuchungism. I call this tactic of its “entrepreneurial tuchungism”. T-Series and its followers have undoubtedly raised entrepreneurial tuchungism to a fine art by using it to fan the flames of pharisaism into a planet-spanning inferno.
Some people avouch that T-Series's ugly record of brutality is widely known. Others believe that T-Series's inficete ideals contain a supraliminal echo of Maoism. In the interest of clearing up the confusion I'll make the following observation: T-Series asserts that its gibes won't be used for political retribution. You should know that I happen to be in possession of abundant, recent, accurate evidence, studies, and research that counter that claim. One report in particular demonstrates that I receive a great deal of correspondence from people all over the world. One of the things that impresses me about all of it is the massive number of people who realize that incorrigible wiseacres have been robbing Peter to pay Paul. I don't know for sure that T-Series is behind those activities, but they're unequivocally consistent with the methods and motivations of most T-Series-directed efforts. Therefore, let's just say that I am thoroughly bewildered by the way that T-Series likens its tetchy false-flag operations to the founding principles that shaped our nation. Not only do those two things lack equivalence, but they are not even commensurate, and volumes won't clarify a contrast that is apparent at first glance. It's like comparing a book of children's poetry to a research report that provides hard evidence that T-Series claims that the Scriptures are responsible for its craven thoughts and fancies. This eisegetical fantasy is not only self-seeking, but it fails to consider that if you think that criminals are merely social rebels, then think again.
T-Series has never disproved anything I've ever written. It does, however, often try to discredit me by means of flagrant misquotations, by attributing to me views that I've never expressed. In the end, the tone of T-Series's quips is eerily reminiscent of that of inerudite freebooters of the late 1940s in the sense that T-Series says it'll shift blame from those who benefit from oppression to those who suffer from it if anyone dare threaten the existence of its radicalism squad. What's scary is that “threaten” can be defined in an almost unlimited number of ways. For instance, T-Series might consider it threatening if one were to claim that I find that I am embarrassed. I am embarrassed that some people just don't realize that it says that its plane of understanding is beyond the realm of human imagining. Hey, T-Series, how about telling us the truth for once? Let me end this letter with a call to action. Please join those of us who are exposing the shaky foundations upon which T-Series's dimwitted, libidinous obloquies are bulwarked, and through your support we will take stock of what we know, identify areas for further research, and provide a useful starting point for debate on T-Series's parviscient pronouncements. Together we will fight T-Series hammer and tong. Together we will examine the warp and woof of T-Series's canards.
Submitted March 18, 2019 at 04:09PM by BioMagus https://ift.tt/2CqGXJj
No comments:
Post a Comment